It happens more than we would like, given who we are and what we specialize in, but when I saw the cover story to the March 21, 2008 edition of Golf World I knew it was bound to be there. Golf World called this latest offering their Backspin Issue and the cover featured four golfers who graduated high school in 1969 and played on the PGA Tour together. I knew that they would somehow dog Persimmon because they always do in these throwback-themed editions. Click here to read the article.
What I knew would be in this issue was some slight about Persimmon. With the Golf Digest publications it has become the easy thing to write about because it seems like such an easy shot to hit. The fact is the subject, like golf, is subjective and complicated. Most writers reduce it to simple anecdotes and, consequently, sound bites that look good on paper but are filled with opinion based on assumptions; and, all this sounds plausible because the assumptions are so imbedded. It is easy to develop an animosity about Persimmon woods when that is all you read and hear about it.
Kentucky author and philosopher, Wendell Berry, talks about this in an essay he wrote about the economics of technology in the modern world. He writes: “The paramount doctrine of the economic and technological euphoria of recent decades has been that everything depends on innovation. It was understood as desirable, and even necessary, that we should go on and on from one technological innovation to the next, which would cause the economy to ‘grow’ and make everything better and better. This of course implied at every point a hatred of the past, of all things inherited and free. All things superseded in our progress of innovations, whatever their value might have been, were discounted as of no value at all.”
Golf now is at the zenith of what Berry calls a “technological euphoria,” and for its part this has not bettered the game. The game is no longer growing and handicaps are not improving. The buzz of golf is not as loud and the addiction no longer as acute in those that have been bitten. In part, the “hatred of the past” Berry references has eroded what makes golf different and special; golf is a lifestyle that is both recreational and sacred, and this ugly treatment of the game’s legacy is troubling. Articles such as this one (and we could give you a handful of others, seemingly all from Golf Digest or Golf World) that build on the momentum of disdain for what has always been good about the game - that is the spirit that it perpetuates and the feeling it inspires. Once this true spirit gets you, then this throwing under the cart our beloved material has to make you mad. Let me tell you specifically what we mean as it pertains to the recent Golf World article.
First, the article, titled “Recalling wood woods,” references “testing” done by Callaway and Phil Mickelson, what is called an “experiment of sorts.” The article does not say to what end the “test” was conducted, and the “of sorts” doesn’t render confidence of a fair, scientific test, but it talks about using a Persimmon driver, and an old ball. It references launch conditions and says there was a 50-yard difference, 25 yards attributed to the ball and 25 yards attributed to the Persimmon driver. This is just not possible, and there is no test or evidence that has ever been done that says there is this amount of discrepancy in distance due to clubhead material. This “experiment” is flawed because there are so many factors we do not know; we do not know what the shafts were (likely the old Persimmon driver was shafted with a shorter and heavier steel shaft) and we do not know the launch conditions - this variable alone could account for a lot of yards. If Mickelson is hitting a Persimmon driver low with a ball that does not spin, or spins too much, then of course the Persimmon driver is going to be shorter. Launch conditions are every bit as important as any other factor in the golf shot. Additionally, this test is not taking in to account that Mickelson’s driver is probably shafted with graphite and the Persimmon is shafted with steel. Graphite is lighter and longer and will always go farther than steel. The problem with this comparison, like it has been since the onset of the graphite shaft and metal heads, is that it is not a fair test. It does not compare apples to apples. No test has ever proven that Persimmon is over 2 or 3 percent shorter than a titanium driver, and that is only for players who hit the ball directly in the center and swing over 110 mph.
Some of the issues we have with this topic are not relegated to Golf World, but to golfers themselves. It mentions Tiger Woods hitting a Persimmon driver (a driver that we made him) but it doesn’t mention the fondness he has for it. This year he has been quoted as saying that if the rules were up to him, it would be all Persimmon and balata. So we love Tiger, he gets it. Chris DiMarco, however, does not. He doesn’t “see the point” hitting a Persimmon driver. Meaghan Francella, a 25-year old on the LPGA didn’t even know what a Persimmon driver was. The story ends here, with a young golfer not knowing what a Persimmon driver is, and Golf World not even bothering to explain to her that it is a club that has won more tournaments than any other driver material. It is a club that Jack Nicklaus won all his major’s with and the material that Arnold Palmer led his army with. Shouldn’t she know that? And shouldn’t the magazines, presumably there to educate the golfing masses, seek to explain this? Am I the only one who finds this embarrassing? Certainly it does the game no favors to emphasize this without comment.
Given our disappointment we recognize that it is not Golf World, E. Michael Johnson or young Meaghan that should bear the brunt of our irritation. It just should not go quietly into golf’s subconscious that Persimmon has no value, as Berry alludes to. It should not be the whipping stick of publications and writers. It should not be the punch line of cute quips on the Front 9. Shouldn’t it be respected and honored for its service to the game? Shouldn’t it be admired because they are crafted, by hand, in the United States as functional and beautiful works of art? The golden age of the game was played with a Persimmon driver, doesn’t that count for something?
It’s a larger issue here that I can tap a few thoughts out on my lunch hour in this blog entry, but at the heart of it we’re here to say Persimmon has value, and to those who already know that, all the beating that it takes is forgotten like a missed short putt. I’m not going to lose sleep on it tonight, but it stings for a few holes.
Josh Fischer
Marketing Director
josh@louisvillegolf.com